Embry Riddle Aeronautical University MATH 142 Homework Help

Get help for Embry Riddle Aeronautical University MATH 142 Homework Help. Class discussions are an integral part of your learning in this course. You are both encouraged and expected to participate in online discussions. Your contributions are part of your final course grade. Please refer to the checklist below for guidance in posting. Read the rubric linked below if you want to know how your posts this week will be graded. Your grade is determined by the adjectives that best describe your submissions. Your task for this discussion activity is to research and write a summary about some historical, important, or practical aspect of triangles. Your summary can be entertaining, but should cover something non-trivial, like where are triangles in use and how do we use them? Your contribution must be instructive to the class. 1. Write a concise summary with a minimum of “fluff”. A contribution should be in the neighborhood of 250-400 words. This is not a term paper, but it should be crisp, with no puffery.

2. Post your initial submission to the discussion no later than Day 5 (11:59 PM Eastern) of the module’s week. 3. During Days 6 or 7, (if work requires you to be early with your follow-up submissions, okay, but let your instructor know you’re having to be early), read all the initial submissions posted by your peers. Note that this part of the exercise is like touring an art exhibit. 4. Post meaningful comments on at least two of them. Keep in mind that your responses in the discussion are graded as strictly as your initial submission. No “me, too” follow-ups. 5. Compliment the contributors whose submissions interested you the most. Tell them why their submission impressed you. While strict adherence to APA style is not required, document your sources in APA style so that your instructor can review your source(s). Wikipedia should not be your primary source, but it can lead you to authoritative sources you can use.

Be sure to add quotes where appropriate, and make the majority of your initial submission have your voice and your thoughts. In a Microsoft Word document, (2003, 2007, or 2010), solve the problems below showing all your steps through the use of the Microsoft Word Equation Editor (Instructional YouTube videos for Microsoft Word. MathType. Follow the textbook instructions to complete the exercises and submit your work. Use Microsoft Mathematics 4.0 (Links to an external site.), which can plot graphs of trig functions, or another tool like the shareware Graphmatica. Note: Microsoft Mathematics 4.0 is not compatible with Mac computers, but Graphmatica is depending on the download you choose. Refer to Course Specific Information for more information about the software products mentioned above. Before completing the problems below, practice using an equation editor with an example from the textbook. By doing that, you can see what you are trying to accomplish.

If you choose a similar problem in your assignment, then you can modify it to fit the assigned problem. Or, if you already know how to solve the problems, first, do them correctly by hand. Then type them in a good format using an equation editor. As a competent user of an equation editor, you’ll save time and see the logic in your thinking more clearly by typing the solution directly. Students who use equation editing tools work faster and make fewer mistakes. Typically, students are slowed down because of handwriting errors (sometimes due to bad handwriting) or by skipping vital steps in a problem. The equation editors help to eliminate those errors. Exercise Set 5.2, Practice Exercises, problems 27 and 69 (pp. Exercise Set 5.2, Application Exercises, problem 79 (p. · Exercise Set 5.5, Practice Exercises, problems 19, 30, and 59 (pp. Exercise Set 5.7, Practice Exercises, problems 46 and 69 (pp. 1. Submit your work in a Microsoft Word document using the assignment activity link above. 2. Timeliness is essential to get the highest possible grade; no extensions.

Analysis and Interpretation Solutions to problems explicitly show complete understanding of concepts and processes used. Succinct, well-reasoned summary when applicable. 50.0 pts Solutions to problems show complete understanding of concepts and processes used, occasional large, but correct leaps in logic. Not as concise as could be, but well-reasoned. 45.0 pts Errors of attention to detail (instructions, arithmetic precision, incomplete responses), but otherwise sound work. Minor weaknesses in reasoning. 40.0 pts Major concept errors and/or Math atrocities (fundamental algebra errors) on more than one problem along with weaknesses in reasoning. 35.0 pts Majority of work mathematically flawed, problems missing or incomplete. Writing and Equation Editor Skill Problems solved and posted clearly with the perfect use of Math Type or some type of Math editor, graphs informative and add value. 40.0 pts Problems solved and posted clearly with good use (possibly errors or spacing issues) of Math Type or some type of Math editor. 36.0 pts Problems solved and posted with fair use (several errors/repetitive errors) of Math Type or some type of Math editor. 32.0 pts Problem statement missing, so student misses parts of required answers. Flow of math solutions choppy, knowledge gaps evident, but improvable.