Grand Canyon University RES 811 Homework Help

Get help Grand-Canyon-University RES 811 Homework Help. How did your passion lead you to this topic or interest? How will that passion sustain you through your doctoral journey? Feel free to include material from your letter of intent if you choose. Although, passion is appreciated, it is important that all learners develop a plan of action in order to be successful. One can have multiple plans of action operant at one time. For example, one can have a plan of action for a writing assignment or could construct a plan of action for this course, the dissertation project, or the entire program. Look ahead to the Week 2 and Week 4 assignments, and construct a plan of action for the next four weeks. What are the steps you are going to take in order to successfully complete your Week 4 paper? What specific things will you do to manage your time (consider personal time, work time, and study time)?

Why do you believe this plan will allow you to be successful? Research support is not required. Doctoral learners/researchers must become information-literate individuals who are able to identify, locate, evaluate, and organize research sources and materials. They must also be able to communicate effectively regarding these sources and materials. The evaluation component of information literacy includes considering the article’s accuracy, objectivity, currency, authority, and relevance. How might assent to solipsism, which you studied last week, affect a person’s ability to evaluate research? Explain. How might one’s ability to evaluate research be affected by the rejection of solipsism? As a reminder, solipsism is the view or theory that the self is all that can be known to exist. ]olipsism merits close examination because it is based upon three widely entertained philosophical presuppositions, which are themselves of fundamental and wide-ranging importance. There is no conceptual or logically necessary link between the mental and the physical.

The experiences of a given person are necessarily private to that person. Before beginning the synthesis process, it is important to become acquainted with the analysis and comparison of empirical articles. In this assignment, you will engage with the Comparison Matrix, a tool for analysis and comparison of empirical articles. You will also prepare an outline for a paper to be written based on the information gathered during your interaction with the matrix. • Locate: Weidman, J. C., & Stein, E. L. (2003). Socialization of doctoral students to academic norms. • Locate: Baker, V., & Lattuca, L. R. (2010). Developmental networks and learning: toward an interdisciplinary perspective on identity development during doctoral study. • Locate: Visser, L., Visser, Y. L., & Schlosser, C. (2003). Critical thinking distance education and traditional education. • This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.

• You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Read the articles listed above. Complete the Comparison Matrix for each of the articles.If a component is not found in the article, enter N/A in the related cell in the table. Construct an outline for a paper that will explain and compare the articles you read for this assignment. Validity and reliability are primarily quantitative research concepts. Morse, Barrett, Mayan, Olson, and Spiers (2002) argue that their exclusion from qualitative research design undermines the credibility and rigor of qualitative research conclusions. Are they correct in this assertion? Why or why not? Saade et al. (2012) describe critical thinking as the mental processes of discernment, analysis, and evaluation applied to information in order to achieve a logical final understanding and/or judgment. Describe your approach to breaking down information into component parts to better understand the characteristics of a statement, concept, or problem. How might outlining help to develop understanding? How do you know when to reach beyond previous experience and seek out other sources of information to enhance your understanding of the work in front of you?