Prepare a medical malpractice case study- EduCare Community Living v. Celedon,

For the medical malpractice case study, you will prepare a paper discussing a medical malpractice case using the IRAC (issue, rule, analysis, and conclusion) formula. You will discuss any relevant ethical theories involved and analyze the outcome, applying legal concepts from the course.

 

In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes:

 

 Analyze why knowledge of the legal system is important for healthcare professionals, including the distinctions between the law, ethics, and bioethics

 

 Compare and contrast ethical theories and discuss decision-making models applicable to healthcare providers

 

 Examine the legal environment in healthcare, including the physician-patient relationship, medical records and patient confidentiality, and professional liability and medical malpractice

 

 Explore the laws impacting the delivery of healthcare, including HIPAA, the False Claims Act, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and laws impacting the workplace

 

 Analyze the role of professional regulation, the standard of care, and codes of ethics in healthcare providers’ accountability to self, their profession, their patients, and the public

 

 Analyze specific legal, ethical, and bioethical issues faced by healthcare administrators, providers, and researchers, including protection of life, the right to self-determination, and end-of-life issues

 

Your paper should contain three parts:   Part I: Introduction In this part, describe your case, including the parties, the facts, and the claims asserted.

 

 Part II: Analysis This part is your analysis and should make up the majority of your paper. This section should be written in the IRAC format. Click here for a description of the IRAC model. Your analysis should discuss the evidence on both sides of the case and the defenses asserted by the defendant healthcare provider. This section should also identify and analyze the ethical theories involved and how they did or did not impact the decision.

 

 Part III: Variation In this part, discuss how and why the outcome would have changed if the facts or evidence had been different. For example, if the plaintiff won the case, discuss a defense that, if available to the defendant, would have changed the outcome (for example, if the defendant could prove the plaintiff filed his claim after the statute of limitations had expired).

 

Final Project Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your submission must be six to eight pages in length (in addition to the title page and reference list) and should use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Use APA style for citations.