All of the ones i have written 3 people found this useful Should a research paper answer a question? There are different kinds of research papers. Some are discursive, that is they describe and discuss. Keep everything firmly on the topic. Never ‘write all you know about’ t…he question or topic. What is a research that answers questions through observation? Descriptive Research Share to: Research that answers scientific question through observation? 11 letter word second letter is e Share to: Research that answers scientific questions through observations? Share to: What is the answers to the question on research project guidlines? It brings it a lot of money it is used as feed. It is used as feed. It is sold to other countries. Barley is a short-season, early maturing crop grown commercially in both …irrigated and in dry land environments. Because this grain adapts well to different types of environments, it is grown in many regions throughout the United States.
Researching is encouraged for answering questions. Just be careful to avoid copying texts from other sources and pasting them, as this is plagiarism, and not permitted. When a…nswering questions, contributors are encouraged to rephrase information they find into their own, original work. Icwai foundation question papers with answers? Share to: What type of research answers scientific questions by testing a hypothesis? I think u should consider secondary research. … agree with that What motivates a consumer to provide answers to market research questions? Curiosity, rewards, spend their time? Share to: Where can you get cxc past paper questions and answers? Share to: Is it important to have a research question when writing a research paper? Yes, because how on earth would you research a specific thing if you don’t have a question? You can’t possibly have an answer without a question. Share to: Which of these do you need to remember when answering a research question? The answer needs to be synthesized from facts.
The number of true believers of RMA in the PLA is small and clearly many of them are simply copying the minds of their US colleagues without a real grasp of the nature of the concept. These enthusiastic supporters of RMA are those war planners in the headquarters of PLA specialised services and the academic staff in PLA education and research institutions. It is they who have spearheaded the study of advanced western military ideas and convinced PLA top brass that times have changed. They are young, well read, visionary, and anxious to create a new PLA that is more professional than revolutionary. They favour China’s modernisation but reject its wholesale westernisation. They entertain strong nationalist feelings but oppose closed-doorism. More interestingly, they see communism as irrelevant to China’s goal of self-strengthening but accept the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) as the vehicle for the realisation of that national goal. Painfully conscious of their country’s present state of military backwardness, they seem to harbor a suppressed ambition which may explode in hawkish rhetorics concerning China’s sovereignty disputes.
] Looking into the future they will wield increasingly more influence within the PLA and even over national politics as a whole. Partly this is because they are strategically positioned in PLA headquarters at various levels with a promising upward career ahead. In PLA tertiary institutions they are teaching the future PLA leaders and forging useful personal networks with them. The significance of the debate among the three schools of thoughts is that before technocrats took over the leadership in the CCP and military, technology was only one of the changing variables in the formulation of national defence strategy. The generalists-dominated leadership had a natural tendency of belittling the role of technology, as reflected by Mao who eyed nuclear bombs as paper tigers. Now the technocrats have a real grasp of the technological revolution and consciously direct the military decision-making process based on the current and future technological innovations. This has eventually resulted in the Party’s new political line of transforming the PLA from a quantitative to qualitative military, formally discarding a long PLA tradition that identified strength with large numbers of infantry soldiers.